The Mother of Jesus

A post in the Something About Mary Every Day In May series.

I just discovered a treasure trove of audio: Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen’s Life is Worth Living talks in MP3 format,  LINK and especially for our series on Mary, his talk on The Mother of Jesus. LINK I’m listening to it now. In these Life is Worth Livng talks, Archbishop Sheen is not speaking before a live audience but is, if memory serves, sitting at a desk and speaking into a microphone. The recordings would then be pressed onto discs. (Disks? I can never remember which spelling is which, and I think I’ve read conflicting things anyway.) The audio can be scratchy at times but I don’t care. I feel like he’s sitting down and talking with me.

As he begins to talk about the Virgin Birth of Jesus, he sets out to look at the evidence for it and he looks at the early Church. Why not the Bible? Because in the very early Church the only Bible they had was the Old Testament. Now, that is important, of course, but it’s also important to realize, as he says, 

“The Gospels did not start the Church, the Church started the Gospels. The Church did not come out of the Gospels. It was the Gospels that came out of the Church. The Church preceded the New Testament, not the New Testament, the Church.”

Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, Life is Worth Living, Talk 46, The Mother of Jesus, 3:58.

Men did not believe in the Gospels because they read about them in the Bible. They wrote down the Gospels because they believed them. Men did not believe in the Virgin Birth because they read about it in the Gospels; men set it down in the Gospels because they already believed it.

It’s surprising how many people do not think about this, and equally surprising how many deny it when someone points it out to them. As a Catholic I’ve found that there are a great many things that I never noticed until someone took the time to show me, but that once shown, I could see very well. And it didn’t occur to me to argue about every single bit of instruction that I received. (I didn’t argue at all, though I did have to make an effort to understand and I did have to ask questions, which were answered very, very well. Note: I did NOT participate in the RCIA for my instruction. Do not get me started. Read more here, here, here, here, here and here. Oy.)

Archbishop Sheen points out that it is the physician Luke who tells us the most about the Virgin Birth. Here I can’t help but remember reading or hearing somewhere that some think, with good reason, that Luke got much of his information from the Virgin herself. And I can’t help but remember all of those paintings of Luke painting the Madonna and Child that were so popular.

St. Luke painting the Madonna and Child, by Giorgio Vasari. From Wikimedia, public domain. I absolutely love this image. Look at the Baby Jesus pointing His finger at Vasari, just like His mama. So cute! And does that ox go everywhere with St. Luke? Maybe that’s what the Blessed Mother and Baby Jesus are wagging their fingers about. ;)

Next the archbishop points out that there were heretics from the very beginning of the Church, but that no heretics denied the Virgin Birth.

“One would think that that would be the very first doctrine to be attacked.”

Ibid., 6:30.

And he brings up a very good point: probably no one would believe the Virgin Birth if he did not already believe in the Divinity of Christ, and that was probably why the Virgin Mary did not speak of it until after the Resurrection. Although St. Joseph, St. Elizabeth, and probably St. John the Baptist knew about it.

One of my favorite images of Archbishop Sheen.

Oh and now we are getting to one of the most common objections to the Perpetual Virginity of Mary: do not the Gospels say that our Lord had brothers?

Answer: The word for brothers or brethren could mean relatives or friends. There was no word for cousin, nephew, half-brother, or step-brother in ancient Hebrew or Aramaic, and the word had a very broad meaning. (See Strong’s #251.) Same for the Greek word adelphos

Strong’s Concordance, 251, public domain.

“These ‘brothers’ are never once called the children of Mary, although Jesus himself is” (John 2:1; Acts 1:14).

Jesus Had Brothers? By Matt Fradd.

There is more to the answer and a little less than ten minutes left in the talk, but I’ll leave it to you to listen to the rest of it.  

Thank you for reading and I hope you’ll join me again. There are so many things to explore and we’ve only scratched the surface so far. God bless you and may His peace be always with you.

This has been a post in the Something About Mary Every Day In May series.


Links (A whole bunch of freebies)


Bonus freebies

Bishop Sheen Today: Downloadable books and pamphlets, public domain. Some of these links were broken when, I suspect, someone brought some of the out-of-print works back into print. But there are still some really good titles available here.

Full disclosure: Some links on the blog are affiliate links. See the About the Site page for more info. Thank you for your prayers and support!

PS: None of the links on this page are affiliate links, and they’re all for freebie stuff. I’ve just got that notice up there in my template so I won’t forget to include it. I know how I am. Oy, don’t I!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.